Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.solaris:533 comp.unix.bsd:7950 Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!comp.vuw.ac.nz!waikato.ac.nz!terra.cs.waikato.ac.nz!terra.cs.waikato.ac.nz!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: Solaris 1.1 vs. Solaris 2.0 (BSD vs AT&T) Message-ID: <1egsjtINNsk5@terra.cs.waikato.ac.nz> From: bcs@terra.cs.waikato.ac.nz (Brent Summers) Date: 20 Nov 1992 09:14:53 +1300 References: <VIXIE.92Nov14194825@cognition.pa.dec.com> <327@wafbox.UUCP> <1992Nov19.164146.26801@osf.org> Distribution: world Organization: Comp Sci, U of Waikato, New Zealand NNTP-Posting-Host: terra.cs.waikato.ac.nz Lines: 21 In article <1992Nov19.164146.26801@osf.org> loverso@coltsfoot.osf.org (John Robert LoVerso) writes: |AT&T != UNIX. BSD != UNIX. SYSV != UNIX. (OSF/1 != UNIX) Agreed! Does anyone have the correct text for Dennis Ritchie's comment re only using the word "UNIX" as an adjective? |UNIX == Tenth Edition. Hmmm, not even sure that is true in any practical sense. |And it is over. See Plan 9. Love to - got a copy of the sources? -- +-Brent Summers, U of Waikato, NZ------------------------------------------+ | Programming: Navigating through an infinity of programs in search of | | one of a much smaller infinity of reasonable solutions. Blindfolded. | +--------------------------------------------------------bcs@waikato.ac.nz-+