Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.solaris:510 comp.unix.bsd:7876 Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!math.fu-berlin.de!unidui!rrz.uni-koeln.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!sunic!ugle.unit.no!Steinar.Haug From: Steinar.Haug@delab.sintef.no (Steinar Haug) Subject: Re: Solaris 1.1 vs. Solaris 2.0 (BSD vs AT&T) In-Reply-To: fwp@CC.MsState.Edu's message of Tue, 17 Nov 1992 03:48:06 GMT Message-ID: <STEINAR.HAUG.92Nov17103910@delab.sintef.no> Sender: news@ugle.unit.no (NetNews Administrator) Organization: SINTEF DELAB, Trondheim, Norway. References: <1992Nov15.014513.28154@nobeltech.se> <1992Nov15.035135.15514@ra.msstate.edu> <Bxt8rG.DE3@fulcrum.co.uk> <1992Nov17.034806.21754@ra.msstate.edu> Date: 17 Nov 92 10:39:10 Lines: 14 fwp@CC.MsState.Edu (Frank Peters) writes: > OSF/1, AIX, HPUX and Irix (yes, I consider SGI major) are all strong > descendants of the system V world. Everything from use of directories > of boot scripts (rather than the BSDish rc.* scripts) to the use of > inittabs to the man page directory structure to terminfo instead of > termcap to a SYSV cron to a SYSV line printer system to a tendency > towards STREAMS points to this. And just where in HP-UX do you find "a tendency towards STREAMS"? Steinar Haug, system/networks administrator SINTEF DELAB, University of Trondheim, NORWAY Email: Steinar.Haug@delab.sintef.no, sthaug@idt.unit.no, steinar@tosca.er.sintef.no