Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!lynx.aba.net.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.uwa.edu.au!disco.iinet.net.au!wa.news.telstra.net!act.news.telstra.net!psgrain!quack!quack.kfu.com!nsayer From: nsayer@quack.kfu.com (Nick Sayer) Subject: Re: more telnet encryption Message-ID: <nyJOwKY@quack.kfu.com> Sender: news@quack.kfu.com (0000-News(0000)) Organization: The Duck Pond public unix, +1 408 249 9630, log in as guest. References: <nyFP3r2@quack.kfu.com> <50onel$e8@polaris.eurocontrol.fr> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 1996 17:05:34 UTC Lines: 18 Ollivier.Robert@eurocontrol.fr (Ollivier Robert) writes: > [ courtesy cc of this posting sent to cited author via email ] >In article <nyFP3r2@quack.kfu.com>, Nick Sayer <nsayer@quack.kfu.com> wrote: >> Stop me before I code again! >That one is easy. If you don't need Kerberos, your answer is SSH. Been there, done that. SSH is nice, but it's not a stock part of the OS. There is still value to adding authentication and encryption to Telnet despite the presence of SSH. -- Nick Sayer <nsayer@quack.kfu.com> | "Huh huh. I feel the animal within." N6QQQ @ N0ARY.#NORCAL.CA.USA.NOAM | "Yeah huh huh. It's, like, a snake." +1 408 249 9630, log in as 'guest' | URL: http://www.kfu.com/~nsayer/ | -- Beavis & Butt-head