*BSD News Article 77484


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.mel.connect.com.au!news.mira.net.au!vic.news.telstra.net!act.news.telstra.net!psgrain!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!newshub.csu.net!csulb.edu!news.uoregon.edu!enews.sgi.com!news.mathworks.com!nntp.primenet.com!howland.erols.net!surfnet.nl!newsfeed.sunet.se!news01.sunet.se!sunic!02-newsfeed.univie.ac.at!01-newsfeed.univie.ac.at!swidir.switch.ch!in2p3.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!jussieu.fr!eurocontrol.fr!polaris.eurocontrol.fr!n
ot-for-mail
From: Ollivier.Robert@eurocontrol.fr (Ollivier Robert)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: SCSI card
Date: 4 Sep 1996 15:29:58 GMT
Organization: Eurocontrol EEC, Bretigny, France
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <50k79m$l9t@polaris.eurocontrol.fr>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.93.960903215141.13825B-100000@bmec.hscbklyn.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mozart.eurocontrol.fr

 [courtesy cc of this posting sent to cited author via email]

In article <Pine.SOL.3.93.960903215141.13825B-100000@bmec.hscbklyn.edu>,
David Zakai  <zakaid99@hscbklyn.edu> wrote:
> I intend to get a Pentium 166 MHz PCI computer with an EIDE
> hard disk, because the card/drive combination is much cheaper,

First, do yourself a favor. Buy a P133 (instead of 166) but do get a
SCSI-only system. You'll have one card for all peripherals, without fuss,
it'll work. Period.

> 1.  Are there still significant incompatibilities when using
>     a PCI-based card (like Adaptec AHA-2940 or AHA-2920) instead
>     of ISA-based cards like Adaptec AVA-1522B ?

The SCSI driver supports non-DMA controllers like 152x but is slower.
 
> 2.  Is the performance boost significant for PCI versus ISA cards
>     (when PCI are double the cost) ?

Yes, ISA bus is limited in bandwidth at more or less 4-5 MB/s where you can
get more with a PCI card.

> 3.  Is there a significant performance boost when using 
>     bus mastering versus PIO (programmed IO) Adaptec cards?

It is more in term of CPU use. Bus-master adapters use much less CPU so you
can get more things done in the same time.

-- 
Ollivier ROBERT   -=- Eurocontrol EEC/TIS -=-   Ollivier.Robert@eurocontrol.fr
FreeBSD FAQ: <URL:http://www.FreeBSD.org/FAQ/>