*BSD News Article 76257


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.erols.net!agate!theos.com!deraadt
From: deraadt@theos.com (Theo de Raadt)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc
Subject: Re: Another censored piece of mail...
Date: 16 Aug 1996 19:49:09 GMT
Organization: Theo Ports Kernels For Fun And Profit, Inc.
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <DERAADT.96Aug16134909@zeus.theos.com>
References: <DERAADT.96Aug12153527@zeus.theos.com>
	<el291bfutai.fsf@zygorthian-space-raiders.MIT.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: zeus.theos.com
In-reply-to: mycroft@zygorthian-space-raiders.mit.edu's message of 16 Aug 1996 13:34:45 -0400

In article <el291bfutai.fsf@zygorthian-space-raiders.MIT.EDU> mycroft@zygorthian-space-raiders.mit.edu (Charles M. Hannum) writes:
   > 
   > The basic story is that Chris Demetriou and Adam Glass pulled pieces
   > of encumbered 4.4 source code off vangogh.berkeley.edu while the
   > lawsuit was still on-going [...]

   Of course, there's a distinction between `encumbered 4.4 source' and
   `4.4-Encumbered source'.  The latter includes a large amount of code
   that was either written by or donated to Berkeley.  It is pieces of
   this code, and not the `magic 7 files', that were integrated into
   NetBSD.  In fact, none of this code was actually encumbered, except by
   the standard Berkeley freeware license.

As far as I know, Chris and Adam and you never got permission to use pieces
of code you took off vangogh.

That makes it as encumbered as it needs to be; NetBSD should not have used
that code.

Or did you?

--
This space not left unintentionally unblank.		deraadt@theos.com