*BSD News Article 76110


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.mel.connect.com.au!news.mira.net.au!news.vbc.net!samba.rahul.net!rahul.net!a2i!ultra.sonic.net!miwok!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.mathworks.com!fu-berlin.de!irz401!orion.sax.de!uriah.heep!news
From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Route cloning (disable - how to?)
Date: 14 Aug 1996 07:12:09 GMT
Organization: Private BSD site, Dresden
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <4uru89$891@uriah.heep.sax.de>
References: <4t0g99$pni@mandolin.qnet.com> <31F518A3.2781E494@freebsd.org>
  <4tnu8u$k61@verdi.nethelp.no> <DvG7FF.M7u@ottnews.shl.com>
  <4ur8sp$nbb@mandolin.qnet.com>
Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.heep.sax.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.6
X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669
X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F  93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E

patrick@qnet.com (Patrick Linstruth) wrote:

> You're not confused.  FreeBSD's routing is brain-damaged.  It doesn't
> think there's a difference between ARP tables and routing.  If your
> FreeBSD requires any routing for anything other than what's directly
> connected to your ethernet card on a single network number, you're
> out of luck.  As much as I hate to say it, try Linux.  Atleast they
> didn't dick with IP routing.  It's time to change FreeBSD's name to
> FreeMACOS.  The "it does it all for you without you having to know
> anything operating system.  And even if you do know what you're doing
> forget it, we know better."

Thank you for your well-founded submission.

4.4BSD's routing scenario is among the best i've seen so far.  What
you describe is a non-problem, as thousands of installations in the
world prove daily.  I've seen too many commercial Unices with a much
poorer routing table management, where you always have to tweak your
brain (e.g., ``metric >= 1 means a gateway route'', why do i have to
specify a routing metric in the routing table at all?, Slowaris admits
in its /etc/inet/netmasks file that ``it should be possible to specify
anything else than a class A, B, or C address here'' etc.).

NB: I'm by no means claiming that Linux does it worse, but your
argumentation is entirely wrong.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)