Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.cis.okstate.edu!newsfeed.ksu.ksu.edu!news.mid.net!mr.net!newshub.tc.umn.edu!spool.mu.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!ns2.edm.net!not-for-mail From: doug@haggle.com (Doug Salot) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: NAT / IP Masquerading Date: 12 Aug 1996 21:26:23 -0700 Organization: Haggle Online Lines: 22 Message-ID: <4up05f$4u1@hurtme.haggle.com> References: <320F7133.41A5@ase.telerate.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: haggle.com In article <320F7133.41A5@ase.telerate.com>, Jim King <jim@ase.telerate.com> wrote: >I have an application where I'm thinking of using a FreeBSD box as a >router to do NAT. This is very straightforward, I just want to do a >one-to-one mapping between one class C to another - e.g. 1.2.3.4 maps to >5.6.7.8 and vice versa. > >Has anyone implemented this type of NAT in ipfw? (This seems like a >natural.) > >I've tried running IP Filter on FreeBSD 2.1.5-RELEASE. It sometimes >works, but today I'm getting a kernel panic every time I try to ping >something through that box. Does IP Filter work better on 2.1.0? I got the same behavior on my 2.1.0R system -- crashes every time a mapping should have occurred. I'd very much like to hear from anybody that got this to work. -- Doug Salot Haggle Online