*BSD News Article 75725


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.erols.net!news1.erols.com!hunter.premier.net!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!netnews.nwnet.net!news.u.washington.edu!root
From: "Steven G. Kargl" <kargl@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.protocols.appletalk
Subject: Re: Netatalk or CAP on FreeBSD
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 1996 09:44:34 -0700
Organization: Applied Physics Lab
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <320A1972.41C67EA6@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References: <girgen-0608960208020001@sl01.modempool.kth.se> <4u7mfn$j5h@lastactionhero.rs.itd.umich.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b6 (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.1.5-RELEASE i386)
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:25175 comp.protocols.appletalk:22252

Wesley.Craig@umich.edu wrote:
> 
> Palle Girgensohn <girgen@partitur.se> wrote:
> >I cannot verify this myself, but everybody using Netatalk with FreeBSD
> >(2.1) (including the author)  claims that atalkd cannot do seed routing.
> 
> FreeBSD is not a supported platform for netatalk.  That's definitive,
> no hearsay, I'm the author of netatalk.  Mark D. attempted a port of
> netatalk 1.3.3b2 to FreeBSD 2.x.  His kernel changes are now part of a
> FreeBSD distribution.  However, the changes have problems, the kernel
> can't support netranges on the local wire.
> 
> We've just got a FreeBSD box up here, and we're going to try to make
> netatalk work "correctly" on it.
> 
> :wes

Is your FreeBSD box running 2.1.5 or FreeBSD-current?  There are 
significant differences between the sources trees of 2.1.5 and
-current.  Julian Elischer has integrated the kernel code from
netatalk into the FreeBSD source in -current.  I do not know if
Julian made any modifications to the netatalk code, but you may
want to look over his work.

Also, note that Mark D.'s port of netatalk depends on the kernel
options LLC and CCITT. The kernel source code that thee options
should pull into the kernel build has been deleted from the 
-current source tree.

-- 
Steve

finger kargl@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/sgk.html