*BSD News Article 75674


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!news.vbc.net!samba.rahul.net!rahul.net!a2i!hustle.rahul.net!rahul.net!a2i!news.clark.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-2.sprintlink.net!news.unicomp.net!cbbrowne
From: cbbrowne@dantzig.brownes.org (Christopher B. Browne)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,misc.consumers
Subject: Re: Why to not buy Matrox Millennium
Date: 8 Aug 1996 04:10:02 GMT
Organization: UniComp Technologies International Corp -- Internet Service
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <slrn50ipqh.a9.cbbrowne@dantzig.brownes.org>
References: <4j21ph$crr@slappy.cs.utexas.edu> <stephenkDvp30A.366@netcom.com> <4u7hv4$jcd@agate.nbnet.nb.ca> <slrn50epup.vrk.knaff@choiseul.inrialpes.fr> <4u9oeg$91j@rigel.tm.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de> <32093E50.39EB@aloha.net>
Reply-To: cbbrowne@conline.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: digital21.unicomp.net
X-Newsreader: slrn (0.8.8.3 (BETA) UNIX)
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.development.apps:19977 comp.os.linux.development.system:29344 comp.os.linux.x:37523 comp.os.linux.hardware:46851 comp.os.linux.setup:67693 comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc:991 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:4527 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:4290 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:25120 misc.consumers:93872

In article <32093E50.39EB@aloha.net>, DuckHunter wrote:
>Yes, you could buy a commercial server, but the fact remains that when
>you buy a piece of hardware, you don't expect to have to shell out $100
>just to use it!

The project I'm on is one where the hardware probably represents 10%
of the total bill for the project.

Software represents probably 35%-40% of the total.  And the other
~50% represents the cost of paying people to do configuration and
programming work to get the computer system working.

All of this represents "educated guesses."  I'm not sure of any of the
individual figures, and not even of the total.  There's likely a couple
of million dollars worth of hardware, in any case.)

It is not unusual to have to shell out money to make hardware useful;
in fact, it's fairly unusual *not* to have to shell out money to make it
useful.

Mind you, the email that I most recently saw come out of Matrox seemed
rather contradictory.  It seemed to imply that they had a problem with
the idea of organizations trying to set up NDAs, when I thought that the
problem was that they didn't want to deal with anyone *not* willing to
sign an NDA.  
-- 
Christopher B. Browne, cbbrowne@conline.com, chris_browne@sdt.com
Web: http://www.conline.com/~cbbrowne  SAP Basis Consultant, UNIX Guy,
Linux Guy.  "Windows?  Ah...  The Athena Project from MIT..."