*BSD News Article 7480


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:7529 comp.os.linux:14931
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.linux
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!uunet!ukma!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!gemini.oscs.montana.edu!osynw
From: osynw@gemini.oscs.montana.edu (Nate Williams)
Subject: Re: Port of new Linux math emulator to 386bsd?
Message-ID: <1992Nov4.195534.29127@coe.montana.edu>
Keywords: math emulator, portn
Sender: usenet@coe.montana.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: Montana State University
References: <1992Nov4.021453.22896@citec.oz.au> <1992Nov4.111732.9703@klaava.Helsinki.FI>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1992 19:55:34 GMT
Lines: 38

In article <1992Nov4.111732.9703@klaava.Helsinki.FI> torvalds@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Linus Torvalds) writes:
>In article <1992Nov4.021453.22896@citec.oz.au> sgccseh@citec.oz.au (Steve Hocking) writes:
>>
>>	Looking at the latest Linux release and user comments on it, it
>>appears that a new math emulator has been written which is more complete and
>>accurate, plus about 2x faster. Does anybody have plans to port this to
>>386bsd (since we got the original emulator from Linux anyway)?
>
>The problem is the copyright: it's copylefted code by Bill Metzenthen,
>so you cannot distribute it under the 386bsd copyright.  The original
>emulator I wrote was also originally copylefted, but I gave Bill and
>Lynne the right to use it under 386bsd (the copyright was changed to
>something like "freely usable for the 386bsd and linux projects"). 
>You'd have to ask permission from Metzenthen - his email address can be
>found in the sources.

Since 386BSD already has GNU-copylefted code in it, I don't see why
using this emulator would be a problem, since :

1) The code will always be distributed with 386BSD
2) The code is only in the kernel.  The only time this code comes
   into play is when a non-FP machine executes FP code.  None of
   this code is compiled into binaries.

The only kicker I see in this is that maybe the Jolitz's don't want
any GNU code in the kernel itself, and don't mind the copylefted
utilities since they can be taken out as a whole w/out any loss of
functionality in 386BSD (other than the loss of that utility)

Comments?  Bill or Lynee?



Nate
-- 
osynw@terra.oscs.montana.edu |  A hacker w/out a home. 
work: (406) 994-5991         |  Keeper of the Unofficial 386BSD Bug Report
home: (406) 586-0579         |  Please send bugs and/or fixes you find.