Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.hawaii.edu!ames!enews.sgi.com!decwrl!nntp.crl.com!reason.cdrom.com!usenet From: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Why was 2.1.5R pulled back and re-released? Date: 21 Jul 1996 11:42:24 -0700 Organization: FreeBSD Lines: 18 Message-ID: <yfg20i5fnxr.fsf@time.cdrom.com> References: <4sle07$8iq@infoborg.dmacc.cc.ia.us> <31EE8546.167EB0E7@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <mandrews.837897387@bob.wittenberg.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: time.cdrom.com In-reply-to: mandrews@bob.Wittenberg.EDU's message of 20 Jul 96 21:16:27 GMT X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.1 In article <mandrews.837897387@bob.wittenberg.edu> mandrews@bob.Wittenberg.EDU (Mike Andrews) writes: Is this the only difference in the "updated" 2.1.5, or were there any other bugs fixed? I ask because have 5 machines to upgrade total, and I've already We also added the Intel EtherExpress Pro to GENERIC, from where it was missing, and brought in the 3c590/3c595 driver which had also been accidently omitted. If more was fixed than that, what was it, and are there patches? See the CTM delta which immediately follows the 2.1.5 base delta (on ftp.freebsd.org) - that contains just those patches. Jordan -- - Jordan Hubbard President, FreeBSD Project