*BSD News Article 74233


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.coast.net!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!longacre.demon.co.uk
From: searle@longacre.demon.co.uk (Michael Searle)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: NOT Re: TCP latency
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 23:13:18 BST
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <nF05CBB68@longacre.demon.co.uk>
References: <87ybklz05q.fsf@localhost.xs4all.nl> <31EAD699.41C67EA6@dyson.iquest.net>
  <87ohle1v5h.fsf@localhost.xs4all.nl> <4slan6$53o@uriah.heep.sax.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: longacre.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: longacre.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: Offlite 0.09 / Termite Internet for Acorn RISC OS

j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) wrote:

> Even with -o async?  Remember, BSD (conservatism warning again :)
> defaults to synchronous metadata updates.  I know that several people
> run their development machines async, i do it myself for /tmp and some
> scratch file systems, or temporarily switch to async when removing a
> large subdir hierarchy.  Since you happen to use both systems, it would
> be interesting whether it feels the same if you use async on both
> systems.

So how do I either mount async, or temporarily switch to async? There's
nothing in the man pages or (very out of date) FAQ/Handbook about it.
I think it's something in the fstab for a permanently async FS?

>(Please folks, no debate again about the use{ful, less}ness of async
>metadata updates.)

-- 
Michael Searle - searle@longacre.demon.co.uk