*BSD News Article 73628


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!imci5!pull-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.mathworks.com!news.kei.com!nntp.coast.net!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!jraynard.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail
From: james@jraynard.demon.co.uk (James Raynard)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Stability Vs. Fatality
Date: 13 Jul 1996 14:49:18 -0000
Organization: A FreeBSD Box
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <4s8d1e$1bi@jraynard.demon.co.uk>
References: <DuEC12.L18@news2.new-york.net> <4s7nes$kfv@symiserver2.symantec.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: jraynard.demon.co.uk

In article <4s7nes$kfv@symiserver2.symantec.com>,
 <tedm%toybox@agora.rdrop.com> wrote:
>In <DuEC12.L18@news2.new-york.net>, le@put.com (Louis Epstein) writes:
>
>[some deleted]
>
>>will 2.1.5R really have a lower bug content than 2.1R?

Well, a lot of bug fixes have been made, and not many new features
have been added (deliberately), so by the laws of arithmetic it
certainly should have less bugs...

The whole idea behind 2.1.5 is to allow users to get fixes for
existing bugs without simultaneously getting lots of new ones :-)

>Is this possible?  In other words, are all those bugs being kept track of in
>a database somewhere?  If so, and this database were available to the general
>public, that might answer your question.

A list of open bug reports is posted to the bugs mailing list every
week.  I think you can also look at it on www.freebsd.org somewhere.

-- 
James Raynard, Edinburgh, Scotland
james@jraynard.demon.co.uk
http://www.freebsd.org/~jraynard/