Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!symiserver2.symantec.com!usenet From: tedm@agora.rdrop.com Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Stability Vs. Fatality Date: 13 Jul 1996 08:41:00 GMT Organization: Symantec Corporation Lines: 12 Message-ID: <4s7nes$kfv@symiserver2.symantec.com> References: <DuEC12.L18@news2.new-york.net> Reply-To: tedm%toybox@agora.rdrop.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.6.34.1 X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.2 In <DuEC12.L18@news2.new-york.net>, le@put.com (Louis Epstein) writes: [some deleted] >will 2.1.5R really have a lower bug content than 2.1R? Is this possible? In other words, are all those bugs being kept track of in a database somewhere? If so, and this database were available to the general public, that might answer your question. (I don't know as I don't follow the appropriate mailing lists)