Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news-res.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.ais.net!eagle.ais.net!steve From: steve@eagle.ais.net (Stephen Schmidt) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc Subject: Re: Performance 3Com 3C509 vs. 3C590? Date: 8 Jul 1996 18:53:11 GMT Organization: American Information Systems, Inc. Lines: 30 Message-ID: <4rrlen$h5a@news.ais.net> References: <4rkc94$q6h@ns2.mainstreet.net> <4rrb8a$c12@news.ais.net> <31E14901.27BC@dlpco.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eagle.ais.net X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] D. Chris Daniels (chrisd@dlpco.com) wrote: : Stephen Schmidt wrote: : > Warning: The following _may_ have changed recently, but I have no : > knowledge of any such changes. : > : > BSDI's support for the 3C590/595 is somewhat broken. Under high-load : > situations (we run ftp.usr.com, amongst other traffic hogs), the drivers : > for the 590/595 exhibit their immaturity, and hang periodically. This : > problem has been discussed at lenght with BSDI, and the only reasonable : > fix so far has been to move to a SMC card instead. We had about 10 of : > the 590/595 card mix installed, and had to pull them all to be replaced : > with SMC cards. : Have you used the Intel PRO-10/100 cards? I understand that they are : less CPU intensive than the 3Com 59x. Haven't used them. We (used to) eclusively use 3COM stuff, until our switch to SMC. The SMC's have worked wonderfully, and DO exhibit a much lower CPU load than the 3COMs. Steve -- _/_/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ Stephen E. Schmidt _/_/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/_/ President, Access Division _/ _/ _/ _/ American Information Systems, Inc. _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ E-mail: steve@ais.net, http://www.ais.net For my PGP public key, email me with the subject "pgp request" ALL RIGHTS RESERVED