Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!imci5!pull-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.kei.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!cambridge-news.cygnus.com!usenet-ma From: Michael Graff <explorer@zhaneel.flame.org> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: TCP latency Date: 07 Jul 1996 13:00:16 -0400 Organization: flame.org: yes, we do know everything Lines: 12 Message-ID: <v6wx0gdmn3.fsf@zhaneel.flame.org> References: <4paedl$4bm@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM> <31D2F0C6.167EB0E7@inuxs.att.com> <4rfkje$am5@linux.cs.Helsinki.FI> <31DC8EBA.41C67EA6@dyson.iquest.net> <4rlf6i$c5f@linux.cs.Helsinki.FI> <31DEA3A3.41C67EA6@dyson.iquest.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: zhaneel.flame.org X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.2.33/Emacs 19.31 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.networking:44273 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:3956 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:23002 "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> writes: > Believe it or not, I agree that it is the best (except for TTCP) for the > application, given what is available. It just isn't as well suited to > the application as TTCP is. That is one reason WHY TTCP was invented > and added to FreeBSD. So TTCP is something FreeBSD decided would be cool, put it in, and to hell with standards? Or is TTCP something standard, which I can find in an RFC somewhere? --Michael