Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!EU.net!Norway.EU.net!nntp.uio.no!nntp-oslo.UNINETT.no!nntp-trd.UNINETT.no!not-for-mail
From: sthaug@nethelp.no (Steinar Haug)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.networking,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: TCP latency
Date: 07 Jul 1996 19:54:52 GMT
Organization: Nethelp Consulting, Trondheim, Norway
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <4rp4mc$54o@verdi.nethelp.no>
References: <4paedl$4bm@engnews2.Eng.Sun.COM> <31D2F0C6.167EB0E7@inuxs.att.com>
<4rfkje$am5@linux.cs.Helsinki.FI> <31DC8EBA.41C67EA6@dyson.iquest.net>
<4rlf6i$c5f@linux.cs.Helsinki.FI> <31DEA3A3.41C67EA6@dyson.iquest.net>
<v6wx0gdmn3.fsf@zhaneel.flame.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: trane.uninett.no
In-reply-to: Michael Graff's message of 07 Jul 1996 13:00:16 -0400
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.networking:44291 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:3959 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:23008
[Michael Graff]
| > Believe it or not, I agree that it is the best (except for TTCP) for the
| > application, given what is available. It just isn't as well suited to
| > the application as TTCP is. That is one reason WHY TTCP was invented
| > and added to FreeBSD.
|
| So TTCP is something FreeBSD decided would be cool, put it in, and to hell
| with standards? Or is TTCP something standard, which I can find in an
| RFC somewhere?
RFC1644: R. Braden, "T/TCP -- TCP Extensions for Transactions Functional
Specification", 07/13/1994. (Pages=38) (Format=.txt)
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no