*BSD News Article 72571


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news2.acs.oakland.edu!news.tacom.army.mil!ulowell.uml.edu!tribune.meitca.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!gatech!news.mathworks.com!news.PBI.net!samba.rahul.net!rahul.net!a2i!dhesi.a2i!dhesi
From: Rahul Dhesi <dhesi@rahul.net>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: PPP server over telnet session?
Date: 2 Jul 1996 00:49:53 GMT
Organization: a2i network
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <4r9rnh$3h6@samba.rahul.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: waltz.rahul.net
NNTP-Posting-User: dhesi

I am exploring the possibility of having a FreeBSD machine act as PPP
server for dial-in users.  As I picture it, when a user logs into the
terminal server, the terminal server will immediately initiate a binary
telnet session to the FreeBSD machine.  The telnet server on the FreeBSD
machine will complete the login, then invoke a PPP server.  The PPP
server would talk to its standard input/output, which is of course
connected to the remote client via the telnet server.

What the user will see:

     CONNECT			<- user connects via modem, terminal
     				   server immediately initiates binary
				   telnet to FreeBSD machine
     login: ppp.joeuser		<- printed by FreeBSD telnet server
     Password:
     {{{{&*&*(%&(*%		<- PPP packets begin coming, PPP session
                                   begins for joeuser, preferably with
				   dynamic IP address assignment

Has anybody tried doing this?  I would welcome any hints.

The idea I am exploring is to have the FreeBSD machine do all PPP while
the terminal server does simple dial-up.  There are numerous advantages
and disadvantages to this approach, and I have a pretty good idea what
they are, so I don't intend to begin a flame war about this.  Just
the facts, please. :-)
-- 
Rahul Dhesi <dhesi@rahul.net>
"please ignore Dhesi" -- Mark Crispin <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU>