*BSD News Article 72489


Return to BSD News archive

#! rnews 1967 bsd
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!news.tamu.edu!news
From: Chris Schmidt <cschmidt@me.pvamu.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: elm 2.4 and FreeBSD
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 13:29:37 -0500
Organization: Prairie View A&M University M.E. Dept.
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <31D6C791.4746@me.pvamu.edu>
References: <jmanley-2906960000510001@fw42.metronet.com> <4r3peo$s7j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cschmidt.me.pvamu.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win95; I)
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.mail.elm:19634 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:22547

J Wunsch wrote:
> 
> jmanley@metronet.com (Jim Manley) wrote:
> 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >
> > I have installed elm 2.4 pl 24 on an intel box running FreeBSD 2.1.
> >
> > When I run the command "elm", the program responds as follows:
> >
> >      "Waiting to read mailbox wile mail is being recieved: attempt #"
> 
> You've compile elm with the wrong locking mechanism.  Select either
> flock or fcntl, but *don't* select dot-file locking.  (And don't
> configure it to run setgid, for that matter.)

Why not use dot-file locking.  100% of the unix machines that I have 
seen using elm all use dot-file locking.  Would he not use it because of 
the OS he is running or does elm have some kind of problems with 
dot-locking?

If elm is compiled to not run setgid, will it work no matter what?  I 
thought in the Documentation that came with the source code that you 
really only needed to it to run setgid for security reasons.  Is that 
true, or do I have it all mixed up?


Chris 







> 
> --
> cheers, J"org
> 
> joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
> Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)