Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!howland.reston.ans.net!Germany.EU.net!news.dfn.de!news.ruhr-uni-bochum.de!news.rwth-aachen.de!newsserver.rrzn.uni-hannover.de!aix11.hrz.uni-oldenburg.de!uniol!uni-erlangen.de!news.tu-chemnitz.de!irz401!orion.sax.de!uriah.heep!news From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Choice of FreeBSD with Adaptec 2940UW Date: 29 Jun 1996 17:10:21 GMT Organization: Private BSD site, Dresden Lines: 15 Message-ID: <4r3o1t$s7j@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <graphix.835923967@spiff.cc.iastate.edu> Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.heep.sax.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.6 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E graphix@iastate.edu (Kent A Vander Velden) wrote: > What "release" of FreeBSD should I use to have stable support of the > Adaptec 2940UW? -stable or -current? Thanks. Both support it. It depends on your other requirements which you prefer. (Since -stable has all the driver enhancements, 2.1.5 will also have it.) -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)