*BSD News Article 72246


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news1.erols.com!newsmaster@erols.com
From: Ken Bigelow <kbigelow@www.play-hookey.com>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: routed is trashing my 'default' route
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1996 21:02:52 -0700
Organization: Erols Internet Services
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <31D3596C.A93@www.play-hookey.com>
References: <31C80512.6A80@bnr.ca> <31CB5341.41C6@onthenet.com.au> <4qqijq$f4@anorak.coverform.lan>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kenjb05.play-hookey.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win16; I)

Brian Somers wrote:
> 
> Tony Griffiths (tonyg@onthenet.com.au) wrote:
> : Basically I doubt that your ISP is sending RIP packets down the wire at
> : you and certainly *doesn't* want any RIP packets from you, thus 'routed'
> : (what an entirely appropriated name to give this piece of software
> : although they got the spelling wrong! ;-) ) will timeout *ALL* your
> : routes, including those you added statically or automatically via PPP.
> 
> I don't believe this.  If it is the case, then I assert that it is wrong.
> routed has no right to delete static routes.  Consider this:
>   [Example deleted]
> 
> Anyway, I run 'routed -q' and have static routes on my home machine,
> and routed's never deleted _ANY_ of them on me.
> 

I must concur. Every one of my FreeBSD installations, from my local 
gateway/httpd server/etc on down, had routed -q enabled on it by the 
install routine, and no routes have *ever* been killed by any local 
mechanism other than the normal timeout/expiration of non-static routes.

Ken