*BSD News Article 72121


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.mel.connect.com.au!news.mira.net.au!vic.news.telstra.net!act.news.telstra.net!psgrain!reuter.cse.ogi.edu!news.co.intel.com!chnews!itnews.sc.intel.com!news.sprintlink.net!new-news.sprintlink.net!newsreader.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-5.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-dc-9.sprintlink.net!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!hunter.premier.net!netnews
worldnet.att.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.net.uk!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!awfulhak.demon.co.uk!awfulhak.demon.co.uk!awfulhak.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail
From: brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk (Brian Somers)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: routed is trashing my 'default' route
Date: 26 Jun 1996 00:42:18 -0500
Organization: Coverform Ltd.
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <4qqijq$f4@anorak.coverform.lan>
References: <31C80512.6A80@bnr.ca> <31CB5341.41C6@onthenet.com.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.coverform.lan
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: awfulhak.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Tony Griffiths (tonyg@onthenet.com.au) wrote:
: Basically I doubt that your ISP is sending RIP packets down the wire at
: you and certainly *doesn't* want any RIP packets from you, thus 'routed'
: (what an entirely appropriated name to give this piece of software
: although they got the spelling wrong! ;-) ) will timeout *ALL* your
: routes, including those you added statically or automatically via PPP.

I don't believe this.  If it is the case, then I assert that it is wrong.
routed has no right to delete static routes.  Consider this:

I have a network X with three machines, IPs X.1, X.2 & X.3.
X.1 does not run routed, but has IP forwarding and another network
card connected to "the rest of the world"

X.2 has routed -s running, has IP forwarding, and has another network
card connected to LAN Y.

X.3 has routed -q running and "route add default X.1".

If routed on X.3 deletes the default route, just because the only RIPs
that turn up are from X.2, it's _WRONG_.  Why does it think I added
a static route and then ran routed ?  Is it assuming that I don't know
what I'm doing ?


Anyway, I run 'routed -q' and have static routes on my home machine,
and routed's never deleted _ANY_ of them on me.

--
Brian <brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....