Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!sgiblab!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!news.univie.ac.at!hp4at!mcsun!sunic!chalmers.se!cs.chalmers.se!augustss From: augustss@cs.chalmers.se (Lennart Augustsson) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: [386BSD] DELAY in isa.c Message-ID: <1992Oct29.223837.5796@cs.chalmers.se> Date: 29 Oct 92 22:38:37 GMT References: <1992Oct29.220653.4520@cs.chalmers.se> Sender: news@cs.chalmers.se (News administrator) Organization: Chalmers University of Technology Lines: 22 In article <1992Oct29.220653.4520@cs.chalmers.se> augustss@cs.chalmers.se (Lennart Augustsson) writes: > >Is the definition of DELAY in i386/isa/isa.c really correct? > .... >Shouldn't that be > > while (tick == (getit(0,0) & 1)) ; > Well, I'll follow up on my own article. I tried changing DELAY (I should have done that before posting, of course). This resulted in a hang during boot time. I'm still convinced the original code is not what was intended, but it works! -- -- Lennart Augustsson [This signature is intentionally left blank.]