*BSD News Article 71572


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.mel.connect.com.au!news.mira.net.au!vic.news.telstra.net!act.news.telstra.net!imci3!newsfeed.internetmci.com!hunter.premier.net!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.artisoft.com!usenet
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. other Unix's (Linux, etc.)
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 1996 12:19:47 -0700
Organization: Me
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <31C9A453.67557C96@lambert.org>
References: <4pl73c$3d2a@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <31C48C32.6BFC@www.play-hookey.com> <4q2cq9$sr7@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com> <31C61646.EAB8B4E@lambert.org> <jlemonDt79z8.5yz@netcom.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hecate.artisoft.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (X11; I; Linux 1.1.76 i486)

Jonathan Lemon wrote:
] In article <31C61646.EAB8B4E@lambert.org>,
] Terry Lambert  <terry@lambert.org> wrote:
] >aks@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com wrote:
] >] BSD is dead.  Show me a single major vendor which does not
] >] move or moved to System V.
] >
] >o      All UNIX vendors other than Sun (if you count "System V"
] >       as requiring SVID conformance -- READ SVID III about
] >       gettimeofday(RT), select(RT), getitimer(RT), and
] >       setitimer(RT).  Pay attention to "system clock frequency"
] >       vs. "system clock update frequency".  USL UNIX does not
] >       conform to SVID.  It is not "System V").
] 
] What about Sequent?

"System V" is a term that implied SVID ("System V Interface
Definition") compliance.

I can't help it if it's been adulterated to mean "code licensed
from USL".

That doesn't make the adulteration "correct usage".


I believe Sequent implements the RT section of SVID in the
same non-compliant way as everyone else.


SVID is kind of meaningless if there isn't a conformant
implementation anywhere, don't you think? (Sun fails on
other SVID conformance issues because they have an OK VM
system instead of a SVID-compliant one).


                                        Terry Lambert
                                        terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.