Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!newsfeed.internetmci.com!hunter.premier.net!netnews.worldnet.att.net!ix.netcom.com!ixnews1.ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!jlemon From: jlemon@netcom.com (Jonathan Lemon) Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. other Unix's (Linux, etc.) Message-ID: <jlemonDt79z8.5yz@netcom.com> Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) References: <4pl73c$3d2a@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <31C48C32.6BFC@www.play-hookey.com> <4q2cq9$sr7@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com> <31C61646.EAB8B4E@lambert.org> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 14:37:56 GMT Lines: 16 Sender: jlemon@netcom22.netcom.com In article <31C61646.EAB8B4E@lambert.org>, Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> wrote: >aks@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com wrote: >] BSD is dead. Show me a single major vendor which does not >] move or moved to System V. > >o All UNIX vendors other than Sun (if you count "System V" > as requiring SVID conformance -- READ SVID III about > gettimeofday(RT), select(RT), getitimer(RT), and > setitimer(RT). Pay attention to "system clock frequency" > vs. "system clock update frequency". USL UNIX does not > conform to SVID. It is not "System V"). What about Sequent? -- Jonathan