Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!news.ti.com!news.dseg.ti.com!news From: rnestor@ti.com (Bob Nestor) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: boot.flp sucks!!! FreeBSD guys. Date: 17 Jun 1996 12:53:46 GMT Organization: Systems Group, Texas Instruments Lines: 14 Message-ID: <4q3kgq$le4@mksrv1.dseg.ti.com> References: <4q08o1$jfn@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com> <4q1c1a$19c_002@mypc.neosoft.com> Reply-To: rnestor@metronet.com,rnestor@ti.com NNTP-Posting-Host: cna0188378-01.dseg.ti.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7 In article <4q1c1a$19c_002@mypc.neosoft.com>, conrads@neosoft.com says... > >Speaking of things that SUCK... > >Providing only "experimental" (read: doesn't fucking work!) support for IDE >CD-ROMs *really* blows. > Whoa! My IDE CD-ROM worked right out of the box with the 2.1 release on CD-ROM and it's worked with all the SNAPs since. "Experimental" may mean it doesn't work on all IDE CD drives, but certainly doesn't mean it's busted for every IDE CD drive. -bob