*BSD News Article 7063


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!uunet!pipex!warwick!uknet!doc.ic.ac.uk!jrg
From: jrg@doc.ic.ac.uk (James Grinter)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: Non-Newbie (oldbie) has problems with patchkit.
Message-ID: <JRG.92Oct26135211@oak49.doc.ic.ac.uk>
Date: 26 Oct 92 13:52:11 GMT
References: <1992Oct22.151446.12339@novatel.cuc.ab.ca>
	<rik.719833108@nella5.cc.monash.edu.au>
Organization: Dept. Of Computing, Imperial College of STM, UoL, UK
Lines: 26
NNTP-Posting-Host: oak49.doc.ic.ac.uk
In-reply-to: rik@nella5.cc.monash.edu.au's message of Fri, 23 Oct 1992 09:38:28 GMT

In article <rik.719833108@nella5.cc.monash.edu.au> rik@nella5.cc.monash.edu.au (Rik Harris) writes:

   I had the same problem (well, as close as you can get when you can
   hardly read the error message before it reboots.... I did notice that
   the last line of the message was "press any key to reboot").  I did a

   >Oh, for information sake,  at home I have an Intel 386-16 motherboard
   >(with very OLD phoenix bios; like it matters), the DX processor, 8.5 MB
   >RAM, Maxtor 1140, WD1006, 3c503, etc....

   This is with a 486DX2-50, IDE, OPTI chipset, AMI BIOS, 16Mb Ram, and a
   Conner CP3544.

On a friends machine, a 486DX-33 ISA, IDE, AMI BIOS, 8MB Ram, we had
this problem of constant rebooting after we applied patches and
things. At first we disabled the internal processor cache, and then
all was well.  Thinking this a bit odd, we tried reenabling it and
then lowering the ISA bus speed. All now works well.

Time dependant stuff in one of the patches perhaps?

James.
--
James Grinter, c/o Dept Of Computing, Imperial College, LONDON, SW7 2BZ.
jrg@doc.ic.ac.uk (jrg@uk.ac.ic.doc for some uk'ers)         (AMS mail accepted)
"If it ain't broken, don't fix it!"