Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!news.sdsmt.edu!nntp.uac.net!news.tufts.edu!blanket.mitre.org!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news1.erols.com!newsmaster@erols.com From: Ken Bigelow <kbigelow@www.play-hookey.com> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: BSDI compatibility in 2.1-stable ? Date: Mon, 03 Jun 1996 21:37:04 -0700 Organization: Erols Internet Services Lines: 19 Message-ID: <31B3BD70.1FBD@www.play-hookey.com> References: <31B2E552.1372@marben.be> Reply-To: kbigelow@www.play-hookey.com NNTP-Posting-Host: kenjb05.play-hookey.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b4 (Win16; I) Jean-Pierre Morant wrote: > > I've heard that the latest 2.1-stable supports BSDI binaries. Is it true > ?Does anyone have experience with this ? > > Thanks > > JPM > The only one I've tried is the BSDI version of Netscape for X window. At least some versions of Netscape want an X11 directory instead of X11R6. However, once I put a symlink into /usr/local: ln -s X11R6 X11 Netscape has been perfectly happy. Ken