*BSD News Article 69992


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.hawaii.edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.msfc.nasa.gov!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsreader.sprintlink.net!sparky.midwest.net!usenet
From: lparsons@midwest.net (Lloyd Parsons)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.bill-gates,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,alt.org.team-os2,alt.destroy.microsoft,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Why no M$ AppleScript or Rexx imitations?
Date: 2 Jun 1996 15:21:56 GMT
Organization: Herrin, IL
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <4osbik$nho@sparky.midwest.net>
References: <4mlpnf$d4p@sidhe.memra.com> <4muhf9$giv@phobos.Candle.Com> <4npu4t$c7j@access1.digex.net> <4o0a60$9ff@kf8nh.apk.net> <petrichDs5Fv9.5Cr@netcom.com> <4ohcuv$772@ari.ari.net><4mlpnf$d4p@sidhe.memra.com> <4muhf9$giv@phobos.Candle.Com> <4npu4t$c7j@access1.digex.net> <4o0a60$9ff@kf8nh.apk.net> <petrichDs5Fv9.5Cr@netcom.com> <4ohcuv$772@ari.ari.net> <4op27j$igq@newnews.iafrica.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: marion11.midwest.net
X-Newsreader: NeoLogic News for OS/2 [version: 4.5c UNREGISTERED 15 days remaining]
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au alt.fan.bill-gates:22867 comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc:108576 comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc:144693 comp.os.os2.advocacy:206811 comp.sys.mac.advocacy:110876 comp.os.linux.advocacy:50785 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:20532

In message <4op27j$igq@newnews.iafrica.com> - cquirke@iafrica.com (Chris
Quirke) writes:
:>
:>kiyoinc@kiyoinc.com wrote:
:>
:>>In <petrichDs5Fv9.5Cr@netcom.com>, petrich@netcom.com (Loren Petrich) writes:
:>>When Microsoft builds hardware what do you get?  A mouse and keyboard! 
:>
:>>When IBM builds hardware what do you get?  Robot tape libraries that
:>>hold Terabytes of data,  fibre optic data connections that run at
:>>hundreds of mega bytes per second,  un-interruptable,  remotely
:>>maintainable, parallel, redundant, mirrored, archived, restorable,
:>>failsafe.  Hardware that runs for decades.  CPU's that can be maintained
:>>and upgraded while the operating system is running production work.
:>
:>Can almost forgive them CGA, under-clocked processors, MCA, PS/1 with
:>DOS 4 in ROM, recent "why buy a clone?" PC-300 systems without L2
:>cache, and all those artificial incompatabilities introduced to
:>differentiate the market and so allow huge markups where no
:>competition exists...
:> | A sign that appeared in "The Simpsons":
:> | Springfield Pet Shop - All our pets are flushable.
:>

Some things they DON'T need forgiven for.  MCA, was and is a good
technology, the licensing was screwy.  Had they decided to license it
reasonably, VLB and PCI might never have appeared.

As to the 'hugh markups where no competition exists' - that's business,
they owe no apology for that.  Businesses that want to survive can't
sell everything for the pathetic margins in the PC desktop business. 
The good ones are looking for the niche they can jack up the margins in.
 It's called making a living.

// Lloyd Parsons
// Herrin, IL
// Team OS/2