Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!inquo!bofh.dot!in-news.erinet.com!imci5!pull-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!quack!quack.kfu.com!nsayer From: nsayer@quack.kfu.com (Nick Sayer) Subject: 960501 if_ep.c for 3c589? Message-ID: <npWUreM@quack.kfu.com> Sender: news@quack.kfu.com (0000-News(0000)) Organization: The Duck Pond public unix, +1 408 249 9630, log in as guest. Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 15:21:48 UTC Lines: 19 I am about to upgrade my laptop to 2.2-960501-SNAP. Trouble is, it appears that the 960501 version of if_ep.c does not have pccard support. This seems a bit odd since the laptop has pccard-test-960207 on it which has a perfectly good pccard compatable if_ep.c. I could use if_zp.c, I suppose, but that driver doesn't know anything about the "new" pccardd way of doing things, which means it won't hot-plug. There are substantial enough diffs between the 960501 if_ep.c and the one from the pccard-test suite seem substantial enough that I haven't tried just substituting it. Am I missing something here? -- Nick Sayer <nsayer@quack.kfu.com> | "To envision how a 4-processor system N6QQQ @ N0ARY.#NORCAL.CA.USA.NOAM | running [SunOS] 4.1.x works, think of +1 408 249 9630, log in as 'guest' | four kids and one bathroom." URL: http://www.kfu.com/~nsayer/ | -- John DiMarco