*BSD News Article 69428


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!EU.net!usenet2.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!jraynard.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail
From: james@jraynard.demon.co.uk (James Raynard)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Signal 11
Date: 25 May 1996 22:51:54 -0000
Organization: A FreeBSD Box
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <4o82ua$br6@jraynard.demon.co.uk>
References: <nD356D43A@longacre.demon.co.uk> <4o5bp9$gel@jraynard.demon.co.uk> <nD3E85F90@longacre.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: jraynard.demon.co.uk

In article <nD3E85F90@longacre.demon.co.uk>,
Michael Searle <searle@longacre.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>james@jraynard.demon.co.uk (James Raynard) wrote:

>> They can also be caused by running out of swap, which certainly sounds
>> like a possible explanation for the problems you described. How much
>> swap do you have?
>
>64 megs. Once the signal 11 was when I ran out of swap, but not the other
>times - with only 16 megs of RAM, it usually becomes too slow to use before
>I get near using all the swap.

Hmm. Maybe it is hardware-related then (I assume you're running the
release version and not -current, where strange things can sometimes
happen).

The best thing I can suggest is playing around with BIOS settings -
trying less aggressive caching, adding a wait state, that kind of
thing. Make sure you write your current settings down on a piece of
paper first, though!

-- 
James Raynard, Edinburgh, Scotland
jraynard@dial.pipex.com
james@jraynard.demon.co.uk