*BSD News Article 69252


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!solace!nntp.uio.no!news.cais.net!bofh.dot!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in2.uu.net!news.artisoft.com!usenet
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux
Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 20:55:55 -0700
Organization: Me
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <31A5334B.52E59C7B@lambert.org>
References: <318FA7CB.8D8@hkstar.com> <4n2btc$1vs@rabbit.augusta.de>
	  <DrI7pE.pF@iquest.net> <4nlrhs$lqr@news1.halcyon.com>
	  <4nmpun$i6@uriah.heep.sax.de> <4nrk6d$14h@mercury.mcs.com>
	  <31A2A83D.67A89A35@lambert.org> <4o21cu$qrn@news.zipnet.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hecate.artisoft.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (X11; I; Linux 1.1.76 i486)

Mikhail Teterin wrote:
]       wrote on 22 May (in article <31A2A83D.67A89A35@lambert.org>):
] =] Since it is sitting in an office full of Windows-for- Workgroup
] =] and Win95 machines, having ksmbfs is a big plus.
] =
] =This one I don't understand -- unless you are using the machine
] =as a single user box, or don't care that every Linux user is
] =using a single set of credentials to access the SMB servers,
] =and therefore you have no user-level access controls.
] 
] Terry, please. Of course it is a "single user box", that's what
] everyone has in the office this days. NT has this problem as well,
] yet people install telnet-servers on it, and do not care, that
] A may log-in remotely, and access drives mounted by B.

I don't.  I care.

] Why don't you tell us where are those patches/sources for FreeBSD
] mount_smb (or whatever it is), so that one can have it if he/she
] wants it?

On a machine at WSU.  I was working for Novell/USG at the time;
they would need to be redone.

Taking the NFS client LKM and the SMBClient from the SAMBA
distribution as a starting point, it wouldn't take you more
than a week to do the job yourself.  Personally, I do not want
to promote this type of security-compromised setup.


                                        Terry Lambert
                                        terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.