Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!uwm.edu!uwvax!newssinet!hakata!ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp!news From: kono@ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp (KONO Shinji) Subject: Re: Xircom PocketEthernet support? Reply-To: kono@ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp Sender: news@spn.ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp (News System Admin) Organization: Dept. of Elect. & Info. Eng., Univ. of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan Lines: 18 Message-ID: <DrLttM.571@spn.ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp> References: <VIXIE.96May10203411@wisdom.vix.com> X-Nntp-Posting-Host: rananim Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 14:05:45 GMT In article <VIXIE.96May10203411@wisdom.vix.com> vixie@vix.com (Paul A Vixie) writes: > Nobody outside of BSDi, that is. BSDI's PE-3 support was really good when I was using 386 notebooks without PCMCIA. Now I have 486 PCMCIA note book, but I think I'll be still happy if PE-3 worked well on old 386 notebooks. And I still wondoer why Toshiba T2200 does not work with PE3-bidirectional mode. (dodemo iikoto dakedo ne..) Anyway, PE-I, II, III are almost dead. This is the result of the disclosuer agreement. If BSDI supports D-LINK, I'll buy it and quite happy to throw away Xircom products like CE-10A PCMCIA cards... --- Shinji KONO @ Information Engineering, University of the Ryukyus $B2OLn??<#(J @ $BN05eBg3X9)3XIt>pJs9)3X2J(J