Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!bogus.sura.net!pandora.pix.com!stripes
From: stripes@pix.com (Josh Osborne)
Subject: Re: Repeat of the question about VFS and VOP_SEEK()
Message-ID: <BwFu1E.759@pix.com>
Sender: news@pix.com (The News Subsystem)
Nntp-Posting-Host: pandora.pix.com
Organization: Pix Technologies -- The company with no adult supervision
References: <b3co03lsb3LE00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> <1992Oct20.193544.2360@fcom.cc.utah.edu>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1992 20:53:34 GMT
Lines: 12
In article <1992Oct20.193544.2360@fcom.cc.utah.edu> terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C) writes:
[...]
>I suspect that VOP_SEEK(), if it truly was intended to be called (which
>I doubt; see my previous post) was intended to be implemented the same
If the OS shouldn't call it, why does it exist?
--
stripes@pix.com "Security for Unix is like
Josh_Osborne@Real_World,The Multitasking for MS-DOS"
"The dyslexic porgramer" - Kevin Lockwood
We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on
when it's necessary to compromise. - Larry Wall