*BSD News Article 67975


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!vic.news.telstra.net!act.news.telstra.net!imci3!imci2!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!info.ucla.edu!library.ucla.edu!agate!nickkral
From: nickkral@america.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Nick Kralevich)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Linux vs. FreeBSD ...
Date: 8 May 1996 08:44:24 GMT
Organization: Electrical Engineering Computer Science Department, University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <4mpmt8$na9@agate.berkeley.edu>
References: <3188C1E2.45AE@onramp.net> <318FD68B.60AD12F6@lambert.org> <4mouan$cpb@agate.berkeley.edu> <dZDkxoHpv+EH089yn@skypoint.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: america.cs.berkeley.edu

In article <dZDkxoHpv+EH089yn@skypoint.com>,
Richard Steiner <rsteiner@skypoint.com> wrote:
>>Are you saying that FreeBSD doesn't work on 3 out of 5 IDE CD-ROMS?
>>Ouch!  Or perhaps I've misunderstood you...
>
>In a nutshell, you've misunderstood him.

Thank you for the clarification.  I stand corrected.

Is it fair to say FreeBSD doesn't work reliably on 3 out of 5
EIDE cards, due to the bugs (RZ1000 and CMD640) you described,
in addition to FreeBSD EIDE driver problems?

>FWIW, I believe both Linux and FreeBSD were affected by this, as were
>OS/2, some flavors of Windows/NT pre-3.51, and many other OS's as well.
>Whether or not it's fixed in any of these I don't frankly care, ...

For those who care:
  The RZ1000 and CMD640 patches have been incorporated into the Linux
  kernel.

  The RZ1000 and CMD640 patches are available for OS/2 from 
  http://www.teamos2.org/hvm/HVMindex.borris.patches.html as pj19409.zip.
  It is also available as:
  ftp://boris.infomagic.com/pub/mirrors/Hobbes/patches/pj19409.zip
  
  I do not know if FreeBSD has a patch available.  Anyone from the
  FreeBSD core team care to clarify this?
  
>since
>I Use SCSI As God Intended(tm), 

:-)

Take care,
-- Nick Kralevich
   nickkral@cory.eecs.berkeley.edu