Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!hobyah.cc.uq.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!news From: hossers@Direct.CA (Randy Dufresne) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: FreeBSD <- - Maximum number of processes? Date: 6 May 1996 10:00:40 GMT Organization: Internet Direct Inc. Lines: 38 Message-ID: <4mkik8$1ta@orb.direct.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: van-as-10a02.direct.ca X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+ Trying to figure out aproximately how many users on dumb terminals can FreeBSD support? In the book "Down Sizing To Unix" (1992) On page 183/184, the author writes: -- quote -- For example, some versions of XENIX that were designed to be run on Intel 286-based systems have a default maximum allowed job acceptance limit of 80 processes. Subtracting 10 for system process slots and daemons, 70 process remain to service users. If each user is allowed seven processes (a shell and six other commands) in a pipe, for example, an Intel 286 running XENIX should be able to support at least 10 users without thrashing. Note: Early versions of UNIX System V, designed to run on slow (16Mhz) Intel 386 machines, came with a default maximum number of processs set at 180. Using the same logic yields a maximum number of users of 24 More recent versions of SCO UNIX, designed to run on Intel-486 processors with ESIA buses, arrive configured with over 460 maximum processes (yielding a support level of 64 users). These numbers are so dependent on individual system characteristics that they are of little use to anyone and may bear no relationship at the actual thrashing point on any of these systems -- End quote -- Warning on the last part of the above paragraph taken, but just how many concurrent processes can FreeBSD handle? Thanks for your input Randy Dufresne