Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!news.vbc.net!samba.rahul.net!rahul.net!a2i!olivea!grapevine.lcs.mit.edu!newsie.dmc.com!news.zipnet.net!usenet
From: mi@aldan.algebra.com (Mikhail Teterin)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Recompilation of X source tree with pgcc?
Date: 2 May 1996 16:28:30 GMT
Organization: Aldan at Newton Upper Falls
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <4manre$43v@news.zipnet.net>
References: <4lj6jn$21p@vulture.dmem.strath.ac.uk>
Reply-To: mi@ALDAN.algebra.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: ip23-max1-bos.zipnet.net
X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.6
Honorable Neil Brendan Clark
wrote on 23 Apr (in article <4lj6jn$21p@vulture.dmem.strath.ac.uk>):
=The trouble is, most things core dump or fall over very badly, including
=the S3 server and programs in /usr/X11R6/bin. Not good.
=
=I'm now moving to patch level 9 for pgcc - my question is, has anyone
=had any success with the X source tree and pgcc at this or any other
=patchlevel?
If you mean pentium-aware gcc, yes. I have X-working on my machine at
work (P90). I built it January. Yes I had to help it to go through.
And I only used -O2 level...
-mi
--
"Windows for dummies"