*BSD News Article 67558


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.cis.okstate.edu!newsfeed.ksu.ksu.edu!news.physics.uiowa.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.corpcomm.net!news.gate.net!news.icix.net!news.america.com!not-for-mail
From: genie@enterprise.america.com (Breakdown)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Historic Opportunity facing Free Unix (was Re: The Lai/Baker paper, benchmarks, and the world of free UNIX)
Followup-To: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date: 3 May 1996 03:13:25 -0400
Organization: PSS InterNet Services, InterNet in Fl 904 253 7100
Lines: 73
Message-ID: <4mcbml$gsn@enterprise.america.com>
References: <4ki055$60l@Radon.Stanford.EDU> <4lfm6m$d2c@rigel.tm.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de> <4lftn3$olb@solaria.cc.gatech.edu> <317C8F0F.307E@curtin.edu.au> <4lgo4c$6fa@solaria.cc.gatech.edu> <317E07F1.441D@curtin.edu.au> <317DAA16.42C86E59@lambert.org>
 <4lqpu1$j7q@news.missouri.edu> <31813BBE.467CAA89@lambert.org> <4lujcs$46t@symiserver2.symantec.com> <3182DF63.2DFB1742@lambert.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: enterprise.america.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.development.system:22916 comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc:915 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:3643 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:3483 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:18625 comp.os.linux.advocacy:47881

Terry Lambert (terry@lambert.org) wrote:
: ] The problem is that any company, no matter how large or small,
: ] must have a "vision" or leader of some kind.  In small
: ] companies the leader is usually the founder.  In large
: ] companies, a sucession of leaders usually takes place.
: ]  
: ] Microsoft is a young company yet, and I'd wager to say that as 
: ] long as Bill Gates is taking a personal interest in the
: ] company, it will thrive.  The big question is what happens
: ] afterward.

: [ ... ]

: ] Eventually, Microsoft will lose Bill G, or he will make a
: ] fatal mistake, and the glass mirror will be shattered.  If
: ] Microsoft ever declares a large loss then it will lose the
: ] aura of invincibility that it currently maintains and Bill
: ] will never be able again to dictate the computer industry
: ] the way he does now.

: [ ... ]

: ] It just goes back to "the bigger they are the harder they
: ] fall"  A huge company like Apple Computer, or IBM is no
: ] more immune to stupid leadership or simple mistakes by
: ] smart leadership than a small company.  The only difference
: ] between those 2 and Microsoft is that Small&Limp hasn't made
: ] any mistakes ....... yet.

: I think that this whole summation is based on some false premises:

: 1)	The inevitability of failure

: 	Counter: it hasn't failed yet.

What I think he means is:

1) The inevitability of a mistake/an error/a miscalcuatlion. Are you saying 
Bill & Co. is perfect in their line of thinking? Even the biggest brightest 
fucking genius on this earth will make a mistake, simply because he/she is 
a human. Period. And as long as we walk this earth we will make mistakes.
	
: 3)	Companies dies of old age

: 	Counter: General foods
: 	Counter #2: governments, specifically Britain

Counter to your counter: Microsoft isn't a fucking food company. And you 
MUST eat, but you sure as hell must not run MS products. Run PICO :-).

: 4)	Perception is power

: 	Counter: Machiavelli's "The Prince"

Counter to counter: what you don't see can kill you, and also what you 
don't know can kill you too, and I didn't need a quote from superficial 
bullshit to support my view. Perception is power, needless to say, but even 
then, when the reasoning comes, rule #2(mistakes) applies to this one as 
well.. misinterpreting the perception... but then again, you have research, 
and that should alleviate the mistakes...

: 					Regards,
:                                         Terry Lambert
:                                         terry@lambert.org
: ---
: Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
: or previous employers.

As if we couildn't tell this, so you needed to include it in your sig.. 
this is the only reason why I don't put a signature, cuz whatever you put 
is so god damn relative and stupid, people just laugh at it...

M.