*BSD News Article 67418


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!inquo!in-news.erinet.com!imci5!pull-feed.internetmci.com!news.internetMCI.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news2.new-york.net!main.put.com!not-for-mail
From: le@put.com (Louis Epstein)
Subject: Re: When is 2.2R due out?
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]
X-Nntp-Posting-User: le
Lines: 28
Organization: Putnam Internet Services
Message-ID: <DqoIwz.2KC@news2.new-york.net>
References: <4lgt27$rme@church.dcss.mcmaster.ca> <4ljdbg$ng0@uriah.heep.sax.de> <DqI2w3.DyI@news2.new-york.net> <31844830.167EB0E7@FreeBSD.org>
X-Trace: 830874562/29769
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: main.put.com
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 14:29:23 GMT

Jordan K. Hubbard (jkh@FreeBSD.org) wrote:
: Louis Epstein wrote:
: 
: > I gather that 2.1.1R is supposed to precede 2.2R...and both will be
: > official Walnut Creek CD-ROMs?
: 
: You gather entirely correctly on both counts.
: 
: > I've noticed that there is a 2.2-SNAP but NOT a 2.1.1-SNAP presently
: > available.
: 
: Mostly due to time pressures only; I've been focusing my time more on
: doing the 2.2 SNAPs and a lack of machine resources forces me to do
: pretty much one branch at a time - I have only one build machine, and
: transitioning it between -stable and -current is quite a chore.
: 
: That said, if 2.1.1 is looking like it's going to slip then I'll see
: what I can do about laying my hands on a machine that can run -stable
: long enough to snapshot it.  I've certainly no problem in theory with
: doing SNAPs along both branches.

Well,the earlier query said that 2.2 was already due out by the end of this
summer(Septemberish)...it's been almost six months since 2.1R hit the FTP
sites,so if there is an every-six-months frequency,one would expect 2.1.1
to be imminent,and 2.2 not to be with us until near year-end...yet 2.1.1 has
no SNAP like the ones that showed 2.1R was imminent,while 2.2 is rumored for
months ahead of what would be expected...