*BSD News Article 67341


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!solace!nntp.uio.no!news.cais.net!news.cais.com!news
From: caywood@acic.com (John Caywood)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Starting up an ISP using FreeBSD
Date: 1 May 1996 16:37:37 GMT
Organization: Acic, Inc.
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <4m840h$731@news.cais.com>
References: <4m5ic0$iu6@apocalypse.dmi.stevens-tech.edu>
Reply-To: caywood@acic.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.138.8.158
X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.6

In article <4m5ic0$iu6@apocalypse.dmi.stevens-tech.edu>,
	pchhibbe@attila.stevens-tech.edu (Parag Chhibber) writes:
>
>This one machine would be effectively a csu/dsu, router, dns server, smtp 
>server, nntp server, www server, and other things.
>
>My question is, is it prudent to do the above on one system (just say I'm 
>running a Pentium 166 MHz with 64 MB 60 ns EDO RAM.  I will have two 2.5 GB 
>EIDE Seagate Drives, four 4.0 GB Seagate Barracuda drives, and two Toshiba 6X 
>SCSI CD-ROM drives).
>
>The cost for the above system is about $5k.  Would my system be quicker if I 
>split the function into 2 computers:

You bet it would be more prudent!  In fact, with increasing ISP competition
profit margins are falling rapidly, so it would be even more prudent to
start with a used 486/66 instead of a pentium/166.  Yes, 2 or more machines
will be faster, but can you afford them *yet*?  Get more and faster
machines when you have enough customers to justify the expense.

You will eventually need to have (at least) 1 server per function, so when
you set up the machine, keep in mind that you'll be removing the function
in a short time.  It helps to plan ahead....

Hope this helps.
-- 
 John Caywood, ACIC, Inc.
	 Atlantic Coast Internet Consultants
         (804)518-9227 voice, 518-9232 FAX
	 caywood@acic.com  URL http://www.acic.com/