*BSD News Article 66672


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!paladin.american.edu!news.jhu.edu!aplcenmp!netnews.jhuapl.edu!uunet!in1.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!blackbush.xlink.net!ka.sub.net!ardbeg.islay.sub.org!ardbeg.islay.sub.org!pmh
From: pmh@ardbeg.islay.sub.org (Patrick M. Hausen)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Why to not buy Matrox Millennium
Date: 21 Apr 1996 14:35:20 +0200
Organization: Patrick M. Hausen - private site
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <pmh.830089693@ardbeg.islay.sub.org>
References: <4kfkb2$dgs@coyote.Artisoft.COM> <stephenkDpoDrJ.177@netcom.com> <3170348D.4496D9F1@lambert.org> <stephenkDq2BCK.B40@netcom.com> <3176AFE0.28146F7@lambert.org> <pmh.829934962@ardbeg.islay.sub.org> <31785FD3.214C1457@lambert.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #1 (NOV)
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.development.apps:14723 comp.os.linux.development.system:22009 comp.os.linux.x:29937 comp.os.linux.hardware:36940 comp.os.linux.setup:51562 comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc:768 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:3413 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:3262 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:17884

Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> writes:

>Patrick M. Hausen wrote:

>[ ... ]

>] >The situation is not analogous.  XFree86 is the car, not Matrox,
>] >and Matrox is a different octane fuel.  Commercial service
>] >vehicles can run on that octane, but your XFree86 car can't.
>] 
>] I completely agree with you, Terry. As this arguement goes on and on
>] I can't resist to ask:
>] 
>] If Matrox is such an unfriendly, braindamaged company - why the hell
>] even care? I just didn't by their product, period.

>I care because I care about free software.

>As Stephan brow-beats more and more free software advocates into
>"just not buying their product" (because they no longer care),
>then it reduces the number of people available to leverage
>a policy change.
> [...]

Again I agree with your statements, but _why_ convince Matrox to
change their policy?

In a free market for every product with every set of features there
are at least half a dozen compareable products (in terms of price,
performance, features) from other companies with a suitable policy.

You can buy Elsa, Miro, #9, ATI, what the ... - don't buy Matrox.

I mean, you want to invest your (and others') valuable time to
help Matrox sell more boards (that would be the net effect of
a policy change on their side). I don't care how many boards 
Matrox sells - they don't pay me for that.
I buy the product that fits my needs, i.e. the components which
I _know_ run reliably with my OS of choice (which happens to be
FreeBSD at the moment).

Paddy
-- 
Patrick M. Hausen   Gerwigstr. 11   76131 Karlsruhe   pmh@islay.sub.org
"Responsibility, n. A detachable burden easily shifted to the shoulders
  of God, Fate or Fortune, Luck, or one's neighbor" -- Ambrose Bierce