*BSD News Article 66484


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!paladin.american.edu!gatech!newsfeed.internetmci.com!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!torn!nott!cunews!neon.ingenia.com!shaver
From: shaver@neon.ingenia.com (Mike Shaver)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Historic Opportunity facing Free Unix (was Re: The Lai/Baker paper, benchmarks, and the world of free UNIX)
Followup-To: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date: 18 Apr 1996 20:23:06 GMT
Organization: Slacker Software Services
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <4l68ba$am2@bertrand.ccs.carleton.ca>
References: <4ki055$60l@Radon.Stanford.EDU> <317339E6.581CCB0B@lambert.org> <4l0gi7$kv7@taco.cc.ncsu.edu> <3173FF99.46221A66@lambert.org> <4l2ofe$jjo@kruuna.helsinki.fi> <31759E80.3B91F731@lambert.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: newneon.ingenia.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.development.system:21886 comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc:731 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:3372 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:3213 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:17785 comp.os.linux.advocacy:46474

Terry Lambert (terry@lambert.org) wrote:
: Linus Torvalds wrote:
: ]
: ] A good idea or design is _not_ good, unless there is a good
: ] implementation of it.  It is *never* a excuse to say that the "basic
: ] design" is good, if the product is bad. A bad product is a bad
: ] product, regardless of politics, origin _or_ design.
: ] 
: ] If the basic design is good, then the product may be more easily
: ] improved in the future, but before those improvements are done
: ] you're just handwaving.

: So you're saying that a slow www.microsoft.com doesn't
: necessarily mean that theye are using a bad implementation,
: it could mean that WWW is a bad idea?

Could mean that it's a bad design. =)
(TCP connection per item, no connection caching (until very recently),
no real state mechanism, tons of MIME headers per transaction...)

Mike

--
#> Mike Shaver (shaver@ingenia.com)      Information Warfare Division  <#
#> Chief Tactical and Strategic Officer         "Saepe fidelis"        <#
#>                                                                     <#
#> "I like your game, but we have to change the rules." -- Anon        <#
#>                                                                     <#