Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!paladin.american.edu!news.jhu.edu!aplcenmp!netnews.jhuapl.edu!uunet!in2.uu.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!ai-lab!usenet From: miguel@sphinx.nuclecu.unam.mx (Miguel de Icaza) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux Date: 17 Apr 1996 13:55:12 -0500 Organization: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico Lines: 11 Message-ID: <s8n34ad6jz.fsf@sphinx.nuclecu.unam.mx> References: <4issad$h1o@nadine.teleport.com> <Pine.PMDF.3.91.960324150948.9390A-100000@PLAINS.UWYO.EDU> <4jejjt$cdb@park.uvsc.edu> <315E0F1A.4E3FB53D@lucon.org> <russ-3103960832150001@seismo.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: hill.gnu.ai.mit.edu X-Newsreader: September Gnus v0.43/Emacs 19.30 > xxxBSD tends to support a wider variety of hardware, whereas Linux > is in a more polished condition on i386 platforms". That fits well > with my own limited experience. Linux now has Alpha, m68k, Intel x86, MIPS, SPARC, ARM and PowerPC ports. Check: http://homer.ncm.com for more information on each port. Miguel.