*BSD News Article 64909


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!newshost.telstra.net!act.news.telstra.net!vic.news.telstra.net!news.mira.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.bhp.com.au!mel.dit.csiro.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!pravda.aa.msen.com!news1.best.com!news.aimnet.com!netserv.com!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.zeitgeist.net!news.pixi.com!usenet
From: rjh@pacinfo.net (R J Huntington)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Linux or FreeBSD?
Date: 2 Apr 1996 03:09:22 GMT
Organization: Pacific Information Exchange Inc
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <4jq5p2$1g2@rigel.pixi.com>
References: <4jpq8b$tfv@lucy.swin.edu.au>
NNTP-Posting-Host: romulus.pixi.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.5
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:16528 comp.os.linux.misc:95790

In article <4jpq8b$tfv@lucy.swin.edu.au>, -=PsYcHlOpS=-@seinfeld.swin.edu.au propones...
>
>I'm fairly new to UNIX and would like to install 
>either FreeBSD or Linux.  [...]

I once told a client the question was similar to: 
"Which is better, Caddilacs or Lincolns?" 

"Oh," he said, "you mean they're both junk!"

That wasn't really what I meant, but you'll 
get plenty of argument about it. Why not try
them both and make up your own mind after
reading the biased opinions of other users.