*BSD News Article 64753


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!vic.news.telstra.net!act.news.telstra.net!psgrain!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!newshub.csu.net!csulb.edu!drivel.ics.uci.edu!news.service.uci.edu!unogate!mvb.saic.com!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!psinntp!psinntp!psinntp!spunky.RedBrick.COM!nntp.et.byu.edu!cwis.isu.edu!news.cc.utah.edu!park.uvsc.edu!usenet
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Why to not buy Matrox Millennium
Date: 28 Mar 1996 03:55:02 GMT
Organization: Utah Valley State College, Orem, Utah
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <4jd2im$19u@park.uvsc.edu>
References: <4j21ph$crr@slappy.cs.utexas.edu> <4j3muv$34m@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu> <4j3v64$1rq@virtech.aib.com> <4j7dg2$t3t@moacs11.moacs.indiv.nl.net> <4j8s8a$q8b@newstand.syr.edu> <4j93n1$4jj@solaris.cc.vt.edu> <31598846.6584@vfr.interceptor.com> <4jc6iv$pbj@solaris.cc.vt.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hecate.artisoft.com
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.development.apps:13953 comp.os.linux.development.system:20398 comp.os.linux.x:28201 comp.os.linux.hardware:35039 comp.os.linux.setup:48340 comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc:389 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:2909 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:2680 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:16401

erik@fenris.campus.vt.edu () wrote:
] I *know* that clean room dissassembly of software is legal.  
] 
] If I wanted to make a clone of windows, I could do so, perfectly legally.
] Here's how:
] 
]  	I give one group of people a bunch of machines with windows, with
] sophisticated debuggers, disassemblers, lots of time.  They find out everything
] about how the interface is implemented. 
] 
] 	Then, _the interface_ is given to another team of people.  These people
] have never seen the code for windows ( in my example ), and they can write 
] based on that code.  The result:  a clone of Windows, perfectly legal.
] 
] This is how a lot of clone chips are created, to ensure compatibility.
] Likewise, how clone makers made BIOS chips from systems once the BIOS was 
] no longer included.
] 
] 
] I am not sure whether or not this is needed to write a X server.  If it would
] make people happier, I am sure that it could be arranged that way.
] 
] I am curious -- is there anyone actually WILLING TO DO THIS?   Or are we all
] just arguing about the academic issue of whether or not it SHOULD be done?

No, there isn't, or Wine would work already.


                                        Terry Lambert
                                        terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.