Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!newshost.telstra.net!act.news.telstra.net!psgrain!newsfeed.internetmci.com!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcom.com!kalessin From: Adam Megacz <kalessin@netcom.com> Subject: Re: Ideal filesystem Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <315C9FE8.33EABA82@netcom.com> Sender: kalessin@netcom13.netcom.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) References: <4hptj4$cf4@cville-srv.wam.umd.edu> <3140C968.20699696@netcom.com> <4ilgto$861@floyd.sw.oz.au> <4j6if4$15gk@news.missouri.edu> <315834CD.7C4DA6C7@netcom.com> <4jeui7$f12@park.uvsc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 02:43:52 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.01 (X11; I; Linux 1.2.13 i486) Lines: 19 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.development.system:20363 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:16361 > I don't believe I've been advocating any of your three options. > > I advocate a variable granularity block store, with the concepts > "object hierarchy", "object naming", and "object content > attribution" being layered sperately on top of the underlying > block store. > > Please see my other posts in this thread for clarification. Look, maybe you enjoy using collegiate, supercomplicated vocabulary, but there are some of us out here that REALLY DON'T UNDERSTAND IT. It would help us all if you could explain your position in plain english, in a *single* posting. Then you might gain more supporters for your idea. - Adam -- Adam Megacz <kalessin@netcom.com> Website ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/ka/kalessin/adam.html Linux - OS/2