Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!newshost.telstra.net!act.news.telstra.net!vic.news.telstra.net!news.mira.net.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!qns3.qns.com!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in2.uu.net!alterdial.uu.net!not-for-mail From: richard lazar <rlazar@ix.netcom.com> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc Subject: bsdi vs freebsd Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 19:20:43 -0800 Organization: Vanguard Computer Sales Lines: 10 Message-ID: <315F4B8B.101C@ix.netcom.com> References: <4j7d18$lp4@host.vivid.net> <1996Mar25.224454.1@spcvxb.spc.edu> <4ji8q7$741@nntp.interaccess.com> <1996Mar30.072020.1@spcvxb.spc.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: banana.vancom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0GoldB2 (Win95; I) Recently I purchased bsdi 2.1. So far I do not see many good reasons to stick with it over freebsd. The added device support is not that important to me. I plan to use the system for primary name sevices, sendmail and pop3. The scripts that come with BSDI are ok, but you still need to edit the configurations. I have another 5 weeks or so to return it. I dont really want to return it, only to find it really was the correct answer for me. I would greatly appreciate any response. Richard Lazar Vanguard Computers rlazar@ix.netcom.com (supposed to be richard@vancom.com, but that is another story!)