Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.bhp.com.au!mel.dit.csiro.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!pravda.aa.msen.com!news1.best.com!sgigate.sgi.com!swrinde!newsfeed.internetmci.com!gatech!newsfeed.pitt.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!nntp.sei.cmu.edu!news.psc.edu!hoopoe.psc.edu!not-for-mail From: peterb@hoopoe.psc.edu (Peter Berger) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,m,isc.forsale.bridges Subject: Re: Sometimes you need X server source (Was: Why to not buy Matrox Millennium) Date: 31 Mar 1996 13:53:10 -0500 Organization: Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center Lines: 34 Message-ID: <4jmkam$j1g@hoopoe.psc.edu> References: <4j21ph$crr@slappy.cs.utexas.edu> <4jjk9o$lah@solaris.cc.vt.edu> <4jjsgr$f3r@hoopoe.psc.edu> <4jk13d$je5@imag.imag.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: hoopoe.psc.edu Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.development.apps:13837 comp.os.linux.development.system:20262 comp.os.linux.x:27977 comp.os.linux.hardware:34786 comp.os.linux.setup:47903 comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc:359 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:2862 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:2640 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:16249 In article <4jk13d$je5@imag.imag.fr>, Alain Knaff <Alain.Knaff@imag.fr> wrote: >In <4jjsgr$f3r@hoopoe.psc.edu>, Peter Berger <peterb@hoopoe.psc.edu> wrote: >:The only timing I've ever had to examine for any monitor with Xinside is >:the maximum vertical bandwidth (sic), as expressed in Hz. Then, just >:choose "Multisync XXhz", where XX is as close as possible to the maximum >:vertical hz of your monitor (which should be clearly stated on the spec >:sheet). > > What about the maximum horizontal bandwidth, expressed in kHz? What >about the maximum pixel bandwidth, expressed in Mhz? Or does Xinside >just "guess" these parameters. What if it guesses to high, and you get >unstable or blurred pictures? And what if it guesses to low, and has >to use the same low refresh rate (can you say "migraine") that it >would use for a monitor that would only support these low bandwidth? >You paid real money for your high quality monitor, and now this server >is not using its features? While you're asking good questions, they are hypothetical: my experience with X inside and with 5 "non-listed" monitors is that in every case the X inside server gave me better performance, resolution, color depth, and with less hassle than XFree86 did. "What if" is a nice game, but I would say that in this case it only has meaning if you can find someone who actually HAS had problems with the server! None of this is to insult the makers of XFree86, who have done an excellent job; but I have to observe that the XInside product has been worth every penny to me, and I have never encountered the "what if" problems you bring up. -- Pete Berger Coordinator, Regional Information Infrastructure Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center