Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:33359 comp.unix.bsd:6492 comp.org.eff.talk:9472 misc.legal:24889 Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!mimbres.cs.unm.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!curtis From: curtis@cs.berkeley.edu (Curtis Yarvin) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.unix.bsd,comp.org.eff.talk,misc.legal Subject: Re: Question on Diamond Clock Synthesizer Date: 13 Oct 1992 18:29:02 GMT Organization: CS Dept. Snakepit - Do Not Feed. Lines: 15 Distribution: inet Message-ID: <1bf4heINNh62@agate.berkeley.edu> References: <Bvy0H3.Lwq@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> <1b9hudINNmv1@agate.berkeley.edu> <1992Oct12.044838.15514@fcom.cc.utah.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: cobra.cs.berkeley.edu In article <1992Oct12.044838.15514@fcom.cc.utah.edu> terry@icarus.weber.edu writes: > > Sorry, reverse engineering may not be illegal, bit it can still be >litigated (and won) by the "damaged" party Oh. Right. Now I remember. This is Amerika - where the two are not synonymous. >please see: > > Digital Equipment Corporation vs. EMC^2 Right. Thanks for clearing me up. c