Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.anu.edu.au!newshost.telstra.net!plaster.csdc.toshiba.com.au!inferno.mpx.com.au!goliath.apana.org.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!fu-berlin.de!zib-berlin.de!irz401!uriah.heep!news From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Is replacing /bin/sh with bash recommended? Date: 22 Mar 1996 00:20:36 GMT Organization: Private BSD site, Dresden Lines: 18 Message-ID: <4isrok$eor@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <4ih5qb$lae@blackice.winternet.com> <4ik5p6$qm6@helena.mt.net> <DoJrqo.6F9@twwells.com> <4ipdtv$d6m@helena.mt.net> <DoL1pq.Fzp@twwells.com> Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.heep.sax.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.3 bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells) writes: > Anyway, I'm not impressed by the notion that, within FreeBSD > itself, they've come to rely on the incompatibilities of their > shell....unless you're going to tell me that it blows because of > errors in the implementation of bash? bash is at least as broken as the 4.4BSD ash. Both try to be Posix- compliant, i.e., the feature allot of things from the ksh. Both have command line editing (even better than the Real ksh), but ash doesn't suffer from too much featurism. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)